El 29/10/13 15:01, Gervase Markham escribió: > Assuming we use the definition of Mozillian as someone who: > > * believes in the mission > * does something to actively advance it > * interacts with the Mozilla community > > then I think that would be a large mistake. > > Having an email address @projectname.org implies, in the open source > world, that you have a trusted position inside that organization. > @debian.org is for Debian developers. @apache.org is for Apache > committers. And so on. > > Giving an @mozilla.org email address to all Mozillians (by the above > definition) would make it a pretty easy thing to get - which would both > devalue it, and also come with some reputational risk to Mozilla. I agree because for me, right know at mozillians.org there is a lot of people I don't consider an active mozillian, it's super easy to get vouched by anyone.
@mozilla.org accounts should come with a fair use agreement, as commit
access or reps, and should be open to any mozillian (paid, non-paid,
rep, non-rep).
I like the endorse idea, but I think that if Reps Council approving a
double-endorsed mozillian to have an account should be enought. The fair
use agreement should take care of bad behaviors and remove this account
if violated.
So the SOP would be:
* I open a @mozilla.org email resquest and cc two already @mozilla.org
to endorse me.
* Reps Council IT Task force evaluates the request.
* If it's OK, they send me the agreements to sign (probably employees
and reps agreements already cover this fair use policy).
* I sign the agreement and attach it back.
* Reps Council gives the OK to IT to create the account and send me
the details.
Regards.
--
Rubén Martín [Nukeador]
Mozilla Reps Mentor
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org
http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano
http://facebook.com/mozillahispano
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
