On 30/10/13 08:25, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > With the current size of the community, I think the more diverse > notion of posts that is natural for smaller planets doesn't make sense > anymore. We need Planet as a community communication channel, and that > it means it cannot also be the watercooler thing where everyone posts > whatever pops into their head at the time, because Planet is, in a > way, required reading in order to keep up with what's happening at > Mozilla, and having a low S/N ratio is bad for that.
Planet is not required reading. (Therefore, by consequence, it is not acceptable to post something solely to a blog syndicated to planet and then complain that people aren't paying attention if they haven't read it.) If there are particular blogs on Planet you feel are required reading for your participation (and that set will vary wildly from person to person), you are of course free to subscribe to them directly, or to whatever subfeeds they provide if their blogging software supports it. Planet provides a useful ancillary service here as a "blogroll" of Mozilla-related blogs from which people can pick and choose. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
