Benjamin, There are two community IT groups. Community IT itself is an IT project. IT asked the Reps Council to help screen the people requesting resources because we're in a better position to know all the regional communities. The resources given through the Community IT project are not Reps specific resources. There is a Community IT task force within Reps to help screen the requests, but our mandate is simply to screen those who are making the requests to make sure they are community members who are active enough with Mozilla to be trusted with the resource. Community IT (the IT group, not the Reps group) handles deciding what resources are appropriate for the request.
It's a bit confusing because the names are the same as it's two different groups working on the same thing. Actually I think Community IT (the IT group) might be big enough now to start handling their own screening if they wanted to. Having the task force handle these requests could make sense, or it might be a different task force, but it also makes sense to have mentors handle them. We'll have to see how it evolves. William, So on the Reps side, - we (Reps peers and council) should establish some criteria for a first wave that can be given email addresses without having to wait for a more general program review. - We need a mechanism for handling the requests, obviously bugzilla, but we probably need a new form - We need to know from IT what they need to be included in the form I think IT is ready to start handling the requests, this is something they already do, but someone from that side should chime in! On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:57 PM, William Quiviger <[email protected]>wrote: > Majken Connor <[email protected]> wrote: > >If this is going to live under Reps then it wouldn't be the Community > >IT > >taskforce triaging the requests. > > > >William by "make this happen" before year's end, do you mean the > >initial > >roll-out to current Reps, or do you mean to start giving out email > >addresses to those not currently under Reps? > > I meant the initial roll-out to current Reps. > > - w > > > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Nikos Roussos < > >[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 03:02 -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > >> > Ideally the next steps could be: > >> > > >> > 1. Determine what budget the cost of offering the addresses will > >come > >> from. > >> > 2. Determine who POC will be (Staff) for creation of addresses. > >> > 3. Community IT Requests Task Force will begin triaging requests > >for > >> > addresses within the approved scope and will notify POC via > >Bugzilla of > >> > approved Mozillians. > >> > 4. Re-Evaluate the roll out in Q1 or Q2 of 2014 to ensure the > >process is > >> > working and consider scaling out to Mozillians outside of ReMo. > >> > > >> > Thoughts? > >> > >> Seems solid. > >> > >> I think the cost is not significant, since we're talking about > >aliases > >> and not real mailboxes. > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
