On Feb 12, 2014, at 20:51, Nicholas Nethercote <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Chris Peterson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Announcing Firefox's "not ads" at the Interactive Advertising Bureau's >> annual meeting gives a strong impression that these are, in fact, ads and >> will bring all the baggage of traditional web advertising. > > This this this. A thousand times this. The "optics" (in the political > sense) of this announcement is about as un-Mozilla as I can imagine. > > Selling ads in the browser -- even the most tasteful, minimal, > reasonable, relevant, privacy-respecting ads imaginable -- is crossing > a major threshold. It'll forever make Firefox "the browser with ads". > And it leads directly into Zack's slippery slope concerns, for which I > have a lot of sympathy.
Not that this changes my opinion on the matter, but it won't make us /the/ browser with ads, it'll make us /a/ browser with ads. Both Safari and Opera have done this for a very long time now. -- reuben _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
