On 4/7/14 11:13 AM, Vince Walsh wrote:
Mozilla's decision to remove your CEO

Vince,

Thank you for caring enough to write to us.

While the press has commonly and incorrectly reported that Mozilla has removed our CEO, that happens to not be the case. There is an FAQ at https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/04/05/faq-on-ceo-resignation/ that lays out some of the facts of the matter. Unfortunately, these facts have been largely misrepresented in the press coverage.

By calling for the resignation of your CEO

Mozilla as an organization did not call for Brendan's resignation. In particular, the board did not.

These calls came from the media, from external advocacy groups, and from a literal handful (as in, five) of employees. Many more employees than that spoke out in support of Brendan as CEO. Unfortunately, the press had a story to sell, and "Employees oppose new CEO" makes for a much better story than "Vast majority of employees supports new CEO while a few are opposed".

If you are willing to take the time to read it, http://blog.gerv.net/2014/04/your-ire-is-misdirected/ has a more extensive discussion on the subject. I hope that after reading it you will reconsider your position on dropping support for Mozilla.

Thank you for taking the time to read through that,
Boris

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to