On 2014-04-03, 8:20 PM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
Often there is not enough data to decide objectively if one option is
better than other.
Voting blurs accountability. That's not the only reason we use the peer
model, but it's a strong argument in its favor: there's no evidence that
voting on complex technical issues offers better outcomes, but plenty of
evidence that blurring accountability leads to worse. At the core of
the peer model, we have this idea that people with a track record of
good decisions are given the reponsibility of making the next one, and
are held to account for that decision.
- mhoye
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
