Jim, I’m not sure if you’re trying to be constructive here. I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt and reply, but if you’re really just trying to attack people, I’d suggest that you’re not going to achieve much.
On Apr 8, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Jim Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well there is are 'mass boycott's of a company's primary product' caused by > CEO Mitchell's blog post and this 'certainly counts as a major problem -- > they have to act'. Yet there has been no action and the blog post is still > there, and Mitchell has not resigned. First, Mitchell isn’t the CEO. Second, I’ve yet to see any evidence of a major boycott directly based on any of her posts, though there’s certainly a great deal of anger in some circles based on misinformation and/or outright lies. > A number of employees have contributed to a major problem and yet there has > been no action. We’re committed to free speech. With that commitment we have to accept that not everyone will toe the line at all times. That’s difficult to imagine in the context of most companies, but Mozilla is not most companies. Most companies wouldn’t have appointed Brendan as CEO, given the possibility of controversy. It cuts both ways. > A large number of employees and members of the community have failed to abide > by the participation guidelines and leave their issues at the door, and this > is destroying the community, yet there has been no action. Can you provide some examples? I’d be happy to follow up with individuals to help them improve. — Mike _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
