On 5/16/14, 9:41 PM, Jim wrote:
Henri seems rather hard to understand, but he seems to have promoted the EME in the end.
There's a difference between "accepting" and "promoting".
Did you ever make a statement on the EME?
http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/advanced_search?keywords=drm&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&hdr-2-name=from&hdr-2-query=bzbarsky%40mit.edu&hdr-3-name=message-id&hdr-3-query=&period_month=&period_year=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-html&resultsperpage=20&sortby=date are the public things I said.
The point is that Mozilla's representative has done nothing!
Are you sure? TAG proceedings are not public last I checked.
The public might not know 'how TBL will decide on such formal objections'
The public doesn't care about W3C process at all.
and Mozilla could have at least called him out.
I believe we have. The "public" didn't care, even the restricted public that follows W3C goings on.
I disagree that following them is 'the least bad option', and it is certainly not the only option Mozilla had.
What is your counterproposal?
Mozilla could have mitigated the annoyance, and been in a better place with users, without supporting the addition of DRM to the web.
Again, how would you do that, specifically? -Boris _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
