On 2014-05-18 04:01, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 5/17/14, 7:30 PM, Jim wrote:
..
I summarized my understanding of the proposal in my last email to you.

I'm afraid I'm missing a crucial part of your proposal: how do you
plan to get the CDM to play along with it?

If the player is defined in a JS/EME web browser then the CDM would play along. It does require that the JS component communicating with the CDM via the EME is a standard. Netflix might refuse to support this standard, but you could try.

If you are sandboxing the CDM, and if the CDM only verifies that it is running in this sandbox, then it should make no difference if it is part of a web browser or part of a dedicated media player, so it could be re-purposed for use in such a media player.

This would allow the DRM media player to be kept out of the web. A general declarative HTML extension could be used to invoke the player.

How is that fundamentally different from launching a plug-in?

This would keep DRM out of the web

How so, if the user experience is still seamless?

The web browser and DRM player are separate. The DRM player could operate alone given a URL, and the player could be remote from the browser for even more secure sandboxing. No DRM extensions would be added to web standards.

The content distributors want the EME rather than such a solution so they can lock the user into using their web base media player, adding their own proprietary JS to complete player, and to be able to provide a rich[sic] experience. This is what Mozilla have decided to support, not the viewing of DRM movies. You don't need to take my word for it, Netflix communicated this in the W3C mailing lists, but when pressured to articulate their use cases they clammed up.

Jim

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to