Here is another alternative proposal: let's list Yuren and Alexandre as owner, and George and Ricky as peer. Does that make sense?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Tim Chien <[email protected]> wrote: > That shouldn't be an option since Yuren and Alexandre will be > continue providing support to the module as co-owners, but not > day-to-day engineering. > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/10/14 05:29, Tim Chien wrote: >>> This is the reality. I don't really know how our module ownership can >>> reflect the reality while sticking with the rules. Please advice. >>> Thanks. >> >> Hi Tim, >> >> I would say that you don't want to have someone listed as an owner who >> is not currently involved in the code. Sometimes people who have >> knowledge of a code area but very little time to work on it are made >> peers, sort of "emeritus", so you could do that. >> >> The owner should be the person involved with the code who has the best >> knowledge of it and who makes the decisions about what goes in, what >> stays out, how design is done and so on. The person with whom the buck >> stops. If there isn't really such a person yet, it's OK for a module to >> have no owner. That's just reflecting reality. >> >> Gerv >> > > > > -- > Tim Guan-tin Chien, Engineering Manager and Front-end Lead, Firefox > OS, Mozilla Corp. (Taiwan) -- Tim Guan-tin Chien, Engineering Manager and Front-end Lead, Firefox OS, Mozilla Corp. (Taiwan) _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
