On 30/10/14 09:41, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > Right but the module system still sits above the Reps Council where as > Ruben pointed out the Module Owner and Peers oversee the work of the > Council and can intervene etc. > > Where Thunderbird is proposing for the TB Council to sit above the > Module Owner and Peers. > > So the situations are kind of reverse.
Well, not really; I think that what is proposed for Thunderbird is that the Council, as a group, replaces the Module Owner as a person. You could think of the Council Chair as the current module owner, if you liked. This is similar to the idea that the elected Reps council members automatically become peers of the Reps module. Anyway, as the person who oversees the Module system day-to-day, I'm saying that the Thunderbird people should keep going with their governance plan, and that it should not be argued that the existence of the Module system is a barrier to implementing it. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
