On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/12/14 12:04, [email protected] wrote: > > I'm working with a volunteer who has been supporting my team quite a > > lot, and I would like to give access to a resource source (appannie) > > for them to be more integrated in our work. (NB: Mozilla has free > > access to as many seats as we want but users need a @mozilla address > > of some sort to identify them, i.e. I can't add them as @gmail or > > other public available address.) > > That seems broken. An email address is a universal identifier. Why > should the fact that other people can get addresses at the same domain > be a problem for appannie? > > Mozilla is moving to use Google infrastructure for all its email, so > it's even entirely the same back end! > > If the issue is that the access control is domain-based only, then there > are various Mozilla community domains (e.g. @mozilla-community.org, and > many regional ones) which may be able to provide the volunteer with an > identifier to use. > > > Is there a resolution here on this question? > > No. > It is a shame there is not despite how much support for such was shown in the last round of discussions. It seems like we just got into bikeshedding over the topic. _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
