On Saturday, 6 June 2015 05:57:14 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: > The rationale behind Pocket was "We're working on a 'save' feature anyway, > why duplicate the work of something that already exists?". Intentions are > important; the intention protects us from the slippery slope argument you're > making.
For the same reason Mozilla is still working on Firefox despite most browsers being mostly standards-compliant noawadays - because there should be an open, non-proprietary alternative. _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
