That's excellent! Point two seems weaker than the two others.

[email protected] wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Members of the platform, policy, and legal teams at Mozilla have been
> working to create a set of principles that should serve as a guide to
> government surveillance activities, and that are grounded in our
> commitment to trust and openness online. We would appreciate your
> input on these. Check them out below.
> 
> The following three principles, derived from the Mozilla Manifesto,
> offer a Mozilla way of thinking about the complex landscape of
> government surveillance and law enforcement access. We are not
> proposing a comprehensive list of good or bad government practices,
> but rather describing the kinds of activities in this space that
> would protect the underpinnings and integrity of the Web:
> 
> 1) User Security
> Mozilla Manifesto Principle #4 states "Individuals' security and
> privacy on the Internet are fundamental and must not be treated as
> optional." Governments should act to bolster user security, not to
> weaken it. Encryption is a key tool in improving user security.
> 
> Requirements that systems be modified to enable government access to
> encrypted data are a threat to users' security. The primary aim of
> computer security is to protect user data against any access not
> authorized by the user; allowing law enforcement access violates that
> design requirement and makes the system inherently weaker against
> attacks that it is intended to defend against. Once systems are
> modified to enable law enforcement access by one government, vendors
> will be under enormous pressure to provide access to other
> governments. It will not be possible in practice to restrict access
> to only "friendly" actors. Moreover, the more government actors have
> access to monitoring capabilities, the greater the risk that non
> -governmental cyberattackers will obtain access. Endpoint law
> enforcement access requirements are also incompatible with open
> source and open systems because they conflict with users' right to
> know and control the software running on their own devices.
>  
> 2) Minimal Impact
> Mozilla Principle #2 states that the Internet is a global public
> resource. Government surveillance decisions should take into account
> global implications for trust and security online by focusing
> activities on those with minimal impact.
> 
> Efforts should be made to collect only the information that is
> needed. Whenever possible, only data on specific, identifiable users
> should be collected, rather than collecting data from a large group
> of users with the expectation that it can be triaged later.
> Activities should be designed to minimize their impact on the
> Internet infrastructure and on user trust. Compromise of or
> unauthorized access to third party infrastructure or systems should
> be avoided if at all possible and is wholly unacceptable if other
> avenues for obtaining third party cooperation are available.
>  
> 3) Accountability 
> Mozilla Principle #8 calls for transparent community-based
> accountability as the basis for user trust. Because surveillance
> activities are (and inherently must be, to some degree) conducted in
> secret, independent oversight bodies must be effectively empowered
> and must communicate with and on behalf of the public to ensure
> democratic accountability. 
> 
> A strong oversight regime involves several components. Oversight
> should be conducted outside of those agencies responsible for the
> programs themselves, by bodies with broad mandates and access,
> technical competence, and enforcement authority. Oversight should
> include statutory transparency requirements that allow the public to
> know that aggressive oversight is taking place and to be able to know
> the scope and scale of government access to user data. Finally,
> oversight should be evidence-based and start with an analysis of the
> national security benefits and potential harms of programs in
> question. 
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to