On 9/9/2015 4:42 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
There is an implicit assumption in the way this is worded that "MY
>government is assumed to be benign, but YOUR government may be dangerous."
>
I don't read it that way, could you be more specific on what parts give you
this impression? I'd like to see if I can see it once you point it out. I
am reading with the context that I know Western governments are actively
trying to subvert encryption and create back doors.
I think that Gijs accurately pointed out the areas where this was
implicit in the draft.
In a followup, Majken replied "Ah, see I see this as addressed *to* the
governments." If that is the case, that would affect my reading. Are
governments the intended audience of this document? The intro calling
this "a guide to government surveillance activities" could be read that
this document is meant to be directed specifically at governments.
:rkent
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
