Thanks; I was struggling to figure out what level of notes to take during that discussion...
-- Dan ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Verhagen, Laurel A [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Gpc-dev] minutes gpc-dev 11 March 2014 for review Date-shifting discussion from today’s call: I’d like to clarify that the strategy in Marshfield is not to round dates, but rather to calculate “age at event” to three (or more) decimal places. We find this advantageous when working with smaller cohorts, such as our biobank of 20k individuals. The method retains the sequence/relationship between events with—for some use cases—reduced risk of re-identification. Laurel From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Gpc-dev] minutes gpc-dev 11 March 2014 for review attached in HTML and PDF -- Dan ________________________________ The contents of this message may contain private, protected and/or privileged information. If you received this message in error, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information contained within. Please contact the sender and advise of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail or telephone. Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
