I shared the code as attachments to 
#89<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/89>. 
dmtoterms.py<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/attachment/ticket/89/dmtoterms.py>
 starts with doctests that discuss the conversion in some detail, including a 
few open issues (e.g. whether provider makes sense as a scalar).

I suppose I went a little off the deep end on this, but it was sort of fun.

--
Dan

________________________________
From: Dan Connolly
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 12:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: PCORI data model as i2b2 terms in babel

I got the m_applied_path issues worked out. Modulo the bug that limits us to 
one level of modifiers 
(#37<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/37>), you can now 
see what I had in mind.

for reference:
  20. [676bf790b72f/pcornet-dm] fix m_applied_path again
(haven't shared the code anywhere yet.)

________________________________
From: Dan Connolly
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 5:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: PCORI data model as i2b2 terms in babel

As something of a review experiment, I transformed the tables in the data model 
spec into i2b2 metadata and loaded in into babel.

The transformation is incomplete sort of by nature and even what I was trying 
to do is a little buggy (m_applied_path especially), but it might be worth a 
look.

--
Dan

_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to