Cerner is only showing the LOINC Parts section of hierarchy. The issue that we encountered was in the LOINC Class section of the hierarchy, which we need since it contains the various clinical LOINC codes for data standardization.
Nathan Wilson From: Apathy,Nate [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:25 AM To: Dan Connolly; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wilson Nathan Cc: [email protected]; Nathan Graham Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #95: LOINC metadata hierarchy depth/count issues We derived our LOINC hierarchy from the Regenstrief mulit-axial hierarchy<http://loinc.org/downloads/files/loinc-multiaxial-hierarchy/loinc-multiaxial-hierarchy-file/loinc-multiaxial-hierarchy-file/view> that I think Jim Campbell discussed with Dan Vreeman from IU/Regenstrief. We had to do some text manipulation to get it to fit the i2b2 hierarchy classifications, but the engineering curating on our part was minimal. Nate Apathy Program Manager, Cerner Research [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | 816.201.2785 -----Original Message----- From: Dan Connolly [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:18 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Apathy,Nate; Nathan Graham Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #95: LOINC metadata hierarchy depth/count issues I re-opened this question about organizing LOINC based on new information from Cerner. This seems worth a heads-up to all of gpc-dev. ________________________________________ From: GPC Informatics [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:14 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Dan Connolly Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Nathan Graham Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #95: LOINC metadata hierarchy depth/count issues #95: LOINC metadata hierarchy depth/count issues -----------------------+----------------------------- Reporter: huhickman | Owner: nathan.wilson Type: problem | Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: data-stds-plan Component: data-stds | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: 68 Blocking: | -----------------------+----------------------------- Changes (by dconnolly): * cc: Nate.Apathy@..., ngraham (added) * status: closed => reopened * resolution: wontfix => Comment: Nathan (Wilson), Hubert, we I notice the Cerner ontology (#58) seems to handle LOINC differently. Would you please take a look and see if you think it's something we should perhaps adopt? Nate (Apathy), did Cerner derive that hierarchy automatically from something? Or did Cerner spend engineering effort to curate it? -- Ticket URL: <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/95#comment:5> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> Greater Plains Network - Informatics CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
