The list seems like pretty reasonable values to be shared. But from reading it, I wasn¹t quite sure of the level of distribution we are looking at far as what is Public, vs PCORI Wide, vs GPC wide sharing of information. Also, how does this address the sharing of data quality metrics. For example, % of vital signs out of range. Also, institution identifiable data vs individual person data might need to be clarified.
Phillip On 4/24/14, 2:50 PM, "GPC Informatics" <[email protected]> wrote: >#69: verify enterprise business concerns and constraints regarding summary >publications of QA stats shared within network >-----------------------+-------------------------------- > Reporter: campbell | Owner: preeder > Type: task | Status: assigned > Priority: major | Milestone: data-quality-plan >Component: data-stds | Resolution: > Keywords: | Blocked By: > Blocking: | >-----------------------+-------------------------------- > >Comment (by jdale): > > Thanks for sharing Jim. The list looks good. We (Minnesota) will >present > this list to our steering committee for review ASAP. > >-- >Ticket URL: ><http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/69#comment:8> >gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> >Greater Plains Network - Informatics ________________________________ UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today. _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
