Thank you Dan, this is very helpful! Regards,
Justin Dale Manager - Research Development and Support University of Minnesota Academic Health Center - Office of Information Systems Phone: 612.624.9747 Fax: 612.624.7458 [email protected] On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Dan Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > The SEER Site Summary is a combination of Primary Site and histology. > For example, breast cancer is not just "cancer with primary site breast"; > it excludes some histologies; in the recode definition > <http://seer.cancer.gov/siterecode/icdo3_d01272003/>, we see: > > Site Group ICD-O-3 Site ICD-O-3 Histology (Type) Recode > Breast C500-C509 excluding 9590-9989, and sometimes 9050-9055, 9140+ > <http://seer.cancer.gov/siterecode/icdo3_d01272003/#_+> 26000 > In seer_recode.sql > <https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/browser/heron_load/seer_recode.sql> > this becomes: > > > /* Breast */ when (site between 'C500' and 'C509') > and not (histology between '9050' and '9055' > or histology = '9140' > or histology between '9590' and '9992') then '26000' > > A blog item tells the whole story: > > - Adding SEER Site Recode to HERON Tumor Registry integration > <https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/blog/2012/01/seer-recode-sql> -- > Posted on 2012-01-24 > > -- > Dan > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [ > [email protected]] on behalf of Justin Dale [[email protected] > ] > *Sent:* Friday, August 22, 2014 4:30 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Cancer Identification\Primary Site VS SEER Site Summary > > Can someone provide insight on the differences between the Primary Site > under Cancer Identification vs SEER Site Summary? > > For example, the breast has nine corresponding ICD-0-3 sites > (C500-C509), all of which are listed under Cancer Identification > Primary > Site > Breast in KUMC's babel hierarchy. I can select the individual sites > or the entire folder to include all sites. Under the SEER Site Summary in > KUMC's babel hierarchy, Breast is listed with a recode of 26000, which I > assume rolls up the nine site codes based on info from the SEER website ( > http://seer.cancer.gov/siterecode/icdo3_d01272003/). > > I'm having difficulty understanding the differences between the two and > is it really necessary to implement the SEER Site Summary in our i2b2. > Does it have to do with a point in time in which ICD-0 was implemented and > the SEER site summary was how it used to be done? > > Your insights are much appreciated. Thanks. > > Justin >
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
