I recommend an APPROVE vote. This is not the document I wanted to see (too conceptual), but at least it leaves to the networks (like GPC) to define their policies, technologies and standards. Umberto
On 9/9/14, 8:52 AM, "Dan Connolly" <dconno...@kumc.edu> wrote: > Umberto, Tom, > > Would you please advise on how GPC should vote on this? > >> Network PIs: Please Provide Your Vote on the PCORnet Privacy Statement by >> COB, September 17th >> >> Following this announcement, the PMO will be providing Network PIs with the >> draft PCORnet Privacy Statement, which is designed to be a public-facing >> explanation of key principles guiding PCORnet's use of patient health data. >> This brief document is intended to complement, but in no way replace, PCORnet >> privacy policies and processes under development by the Data Privacy Task >> Force (in collaboration with bot the DSSNI and Governance & Collaboration >> Task Forces). It has undergone substantial iteration and discussion by the >> Executive Committee, PCORnet Patient Council, and PCORI. Deven McGraw, Data >> Privacy Task Force Lead, was a significant contributor as well. >> >> The PMO and PCORI would like to attain approval of this statement virtually, >> so we invite the Network PIs to provide overarching comments on this >> document, and we would like you to affirm that your Network supports the >> seven principles. >> >> Network PIs: please send your vote (approve, do not approve, abstain) and >> comments to the PMO (p...@pcornet.org) by COB, September 17th. If you have >> other feedback or questions, please contact the PMO at your earliest >> convenience.
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
