Hi Belay, Just to clarify, MCRF is using the LOINC ontologies (Laboratory Measurements and Clinical Measurements) prepared by UNMC and posted to PCORI Central Desktop. I haven't sent an update for Babel recently, but plan to soon.
Thanks, Laurel From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Belay Demeke Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 1:53 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: GPC Lab Tree Construction Methodology Hello All, Looking at the i2b2 Laboratory Test hierarchy construction, it appeared that many sites use different methodologies. For instance, KUMC is built based on EMR, UMNC based on Regenstrief Institute's LOINC tree, UMN based on UMLS, and MCRF based on Harvard(LLB22/i2b2/SHRINE). Our goal is to find out which tree construction methodology is used for the following sites - MCW, CMH, UIowa, UTSW, UTHSCA and WISC. Can you please send us your feedback what methodology used at your site? Thank you, Belay Demeke ______________________________________________________________________ The contents of this message may contain private, protected and/or privileged information. If you received this message in error, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information contained within. Please contact the sender and advise of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail or telephone. Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
