So, you are using text analysis and matching? The stats seem unusually high to me. Have you done any manual review for validation? Jim
James R. Campbell MD [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Office: 402-559-7505 Secretary: 402-559-7299 Pager: 402-888-1230 On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:53 PM, "Bos, Angela" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: At UTHSCSA, our preliminary findings seem to show that we get 98% mapping of Clarity component IDs to LOINC using either UMLS meta-thesaurus or UNMC terms (from PCORnet loincv3_unmc_export.csv). -Angela From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Campbell, James R Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 7:11 PM To: Thomas F Mish; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Campbell, Walter S Subject: RE: GPC Lab Tree Construction Methodology We are preparing a more pragmatically oriented (lab departments and orderables) lab LOINC that is pruned to represent only those lab tests reported in our system. If we could get sets of LOINC codes actually reported from all GPC sites, we would be glad to create the union of the sets and then organize around a clinically friendly view of lab LOINC Jim ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of Thomas F Mish [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:27 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: GPC Lab Tree Construction Methodology WISC started with what simply came out of the raw EPIC system (lab components with LOINC when available). -TM On 11/13/2014 1:52 PM, Belay Demeke wrote: Hello All, Looking at the i2b2 Laboratory Test hierarchy construction, it appeared that many sites use different methodologies. For instance, KUMC is built based on EMR, UMNC based on Regenstrief Institute's LOINC tree, UMN based on UMLS, and MCRF based on Harvard(LLB22/i2b2/SHRINE). Our goal is to find out which tree construction methodology is used for the following sites - MCW, CMH, UIowa, UTSW, UTHSCA and WISC. Can you please send us your feedback what methodology used at your site? Thank you, Belay Demeke _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please delete it and immediately contact the sender.
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
