#90: Diagnoses Modifiers for data attribution
--------------------------+----------------------------
 Reporter:  campbell      |       Owner:  dconnolly
     Type:  design-issue  |      Status:  accepted
 Priority:  major         |   Milestone:  data-domains2
Component:  data-stds     |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:  70, 91, 120   |
--------------------------+----------------------------

Comment (by lv):

 Thanks for this clarification; taking another look, we can use the
 "Diagnosis Sub Type IDS" field here.

 0 *Not Available
 1 Primary
 2 Secondary
 3 Procedure Scheduled
 4 Procedure Incid
 5 Procedure RT SRG
 6 Complication
 8 Other
 9 Unspecified

 Replying to [comment:12 dconnolly]:
 > > 2. Primary, Secondary: Currently we pull all diagnoses, without regard
 for position. To fill Primary and Secondary, we'd need to adjust our ETL.
 How would other diagnoses be handled? Are only two being loaded per
 encounter for other sites?
 >
 > I think "Secondary" is a bit of a misnomer; I think it just means "not
 primary", and there can be may of them. The database column is just a Y/N
 for primary.
 >
 > > It would take significant effort for MCRF to accurately implement this
 series of modifiers. I'd like to hear feedback that the additional
 elements add value for researchers, as we do not have a local use case.
 >
 > It seems reasonable to me that if your system doesn't distinguish
 primary from secondary, you should just report the more general term, e.g.
 "Billing Diagnosis". Or if you don't even know that much, just don't add a
 modifier at all. For studies that require the distinction, MCRF would have
 to evaluate the benefit of participating against the cost of adjusting
 your ETL.
 >
 > But I think I should escalate this issue, as it bears on
 DataRepositoryManagement, which is included in the GPC data sharing
 agreement by reference.


 Am I missing where we would differentiate a source of insurance? Structure
 seems like it would match Encounter Diagnoses. Could be good to define
 now, if the goal is to incorporate health plans in the future.

--
Ticket URL: 
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/90#comment:14>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to