No, I sorted by phase of the moon.
-- Dan ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Chrischilles, Elizabeth A [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:24 AM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #227: Data QA for Breast Cancer Finder File Dan. - please exceed the 250 to account for bad addresses and ineligibles. Minimum to verify should be 275 and I would do 300 - IN ORDER. Did you sort by OrderID when you provided these to the registrar? Betsy Sent from my iPhone > On May 26, 2015, at 9:56 AM, "GPC Informatics" <[email protected]> wrote: > > #227: Data QA for Breast Cancer Finder File > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > Reporter: tmcmahon | Owner: nicholas-rudzianski > Type: task | Status: assigned > Priority: major | Milestone: bc-survey-cohort-def > Component: data-sharing | Resolution: > Keywords: data-quality breast- | Blocked By: 217, 222, 223, 224, > cancer-cohort | 230, 231, 234, 235, 244 > Blocking: 265 | > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > > Comment (by dconnolly): > > Tamara and I joined the randomized list with our crosswalk and started > going over it with our registrar. I just clarified with him that we're > more focussed on the first 250 to 275 than the whole list of 700+. ETA: > Thursday. > > -- > Ticket URL: > <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/227#comment:26> > gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> > Greater Plains Network - Informatics _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
