#304: accuracy of ALS diagnosis data collection
-------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: rwaitman | Owner: mish
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: cohort-char-als
Component: data-stds | Resolution:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
-------------------------+------------------------------
Changes (by dconnolly):
* cc: gpc-dev@… (added)
* owner: badagarla => mish
* priority: minor => major
Comment:
Replying to [comment:2 badagarla]:
> Given that the data dictionary is standardized across the sites, it
should be a simple report:
> ...
> Looks like 15.23% of the patients selected from EMR data at KUMC was
adjudicated to be ineligible by the clinician.
>
> If it is something that other sites also should report, please feel free
to reassign it to other sites.
Let's have at least one of the other DevTeams try running this REDCap
report.
Choosing at random... my 12 sided die nominates
2 - CMH - not participating
10 - UNMC - recently reported behing a bit behind on ALS survey
deployment
5 - WISC
Tom, you're adept at REDCap. Give the report in comment:2 a try, please?
Feel free to nominate someone else (i.e. re-assign the ticket) if you
prefer.
--
Ticket URL:
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/304#comment:3>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
