I don’t know of anyone finding it not sufficient for CDMv3, but my main concern 
was that we don’t all have the SCILHS code.  As far as I know, it hasn’t been 
released yet.  If it is not released by Q1 2016, that is going to impact our 
expected timeline.

Does SCILHS have an expected timeline for when it’s sites will be CDMv3 
compliant? I would think that we would be fairly well aligned with them on the 
timeline since we are all using i2b2 and relying on the same CDM transformation 
code.

Phillip

From: Dan Connolly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, December 4, 2015 at 3:01 PM
To: Thomas Mish <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Russ Waitman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Brittany Zschoche 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"'[email protected]<mailto:'[email protected]>'" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: CDM v3 dependency on SCILHS code (#266, #381) RE: Agenda for GPC-DEV 
call tomorrow

So somebody tried out the SCILHS code and found that it's not sufficient for 
CDM v3? Whoever found this out, would you please give details?

As far as I know, their code is sufficient for our purposes.

--
Dan

________________________________
From: Thomas Mish [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 11:36 AM
To: Dan Connolly; Russ Waitman; Brittany Zschoche
Cc: '[email protected]<mailto:'[email protected]>'
Subject: FW: Agenda for GPC-DEV call tomorrow

Dan/Brittany,

There were some questions on the phone call regarding the estimated 
time-to-deliver on the CDM 3 data. Seeing as we are dependent on Harvard 
finished/finalizing the code, we are all stuck behind them as a final 
dependencies. We agreed on the phone call to assume that their code would be 
delivered with Q1 2016. That base assumption would drive all the rest of our 
estimates at each of the sites.

There was also some concern about the 12/2 delivery date. At least one of the 
sites was hoping that they could deliver this estimate by the end of the week. 
Is there something magical driving the 12/2 deadline that we need to have the 
data in by?

-TM

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Mish
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 2:52 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda for GPC-DEV call tomorrow

Thankt’s to Brittany’s help, here’s a link to tomorrow’s GPC-DEV call:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XZPV0qeq52I5uv5GaWPTdTN9ZI8bxOuh_CjRc_rVAWk/edit

An ahead of time thanks to Hillary for setting up the phone call for tomorrow 
morning and to Nathan Graham for agreeing to take the minutes.

-TM
___________________________________________________
Thomas F. Mish Jr.  -   Informatics Systems Specialist
SMPH-IT    Biomedical Informatics Services
School of Medicine and Public Health, UW-Madison
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>  -  (608)616-0362


________________________________

UT Southwestern


Medical Center



The future of medicine, today.

_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to