Yes, Dan is correct. CDMv3 and transform for MSSQL is available in our Google Drive, sans Death, PRO, and Clinical_Trials. Oracle version will be out before the holidays. Working on transform bug fixes and speed optimizations at present.
Email me individually for access. I am working on moving to GitHub. Thanks, Jeffrey Klann, PhD Instructor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Assistant in Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital From: Dan Connolly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, December 4, 2015 at 3:23 PM To: Phillip Reeder <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Thomas Mish <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Russ Waitman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Brittany Zschoche <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Jeffrey Klann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "'[email protected]<mailto:'[email protected]>'" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: CDM v3 dependency on SCILHS code (#266, #381) RE: Agenda for GPC-DEV call tomorrow It's available for the cost of a mail message to Jeff Klann and has been since Sep 22. Does that not suffice? (I'd perfer that it were on bitbucket or github or whatever, but I don't need it to be.) Reviewing the email linked from ModelMashUp#SCILHS<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/wiki/ModelMashUp#SCILHS>, I see an Oct 28 message from Jeff<http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2015q4/002180.html> that says "we have a CDMv3 transform for MSSQL now (Oracle forthcoming). Death, PRO, and Clinical_Trial tables are not yet supported." I'm not inclined to bother him about an ETA for more stuff until we have tried out what he has offered and reported our experience. -- Dan ________________________________ From: Phillip Reeder [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 2:12 PM To: Dan Connolly; Thomas Mish; Russ Waitman; Brittany Zschoche Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; '[email protected]<mailto:'[email protected]>' Subject: Re: CDM v3 dependency on SCILHS code (#266, #381) RE: Agenda for GPC-DEV call tomorrow I don’t know of anyone finding it not sufficient for CDMv3, but my main concern was that we don’t all have the SCILHS code. As far as I know, it hasn’t been released yet. If it is not released by Q1 2016, that is going to impact our expected timeline. Does SCILHS have an expected timeline for when it’s sites will be CDMv3 compliant? I would think that we would be fairly well aligned with them on the timeline since we are all using i2b2 and relying on the same CDM transformation code. Phillip From: Dan Connolly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, December 4, 2015 at 3:01 PM To: Thomas Mish <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Russ Waitman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Brittany Zschoche <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "'[email protected]<mailto:'[email protected]>'" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: CDM v3 dependency on SCILHS code (#266, #381) RE: Agenda for GPC-DEV call tomorrow So somebody tried out the SCILHS code and found that it's not sufficient for CDM v3? Whoever found this out, would you please give details? As far as I know, their code is sufficient for our purposes. -- Dan ________________________________ From: Thomas Mish [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 11:36 AM To: Dan Connolly; Russ Waitman; Brittany Zschoche Cc: '[email protected]<mailto:'[email protected]>' Subject: FW: Agenda for GPC-DEV call tomorrow Dan/Brittany, There were some questions on the phone call regarding the estimated time-to-deliver on the CDM 3 data. Seeing as we are dependent on Harvard finished/finalizing the code, we are all stuck behind them as a final dependencies. We agreed on the phone call to assume that their code would be delivered with Q1 2016. That base assumption would drive all the rest of our estimates at each of the sites. There was also some concern about the 12/2 delivery date. At least one of the sites was hoping that they could deliver this estimate by the end of the week. Is there something magical driving the 12/2 deadline that we need to have the data in by? -TM From:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Mish Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 2:52 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Agenda for GPC-DEV call tomorrow Thankt’s to Brittany’s help, here’s a link to tomorrow’s GPC-DEV call: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XZPV0qeq52I5uv5GaWPTdTN9ZI8bxOuh_CjRc_rVAWk/edit An ahead of time thanks to Hillary for setting up the phone call for tomorrow morning and to Nathan Graham for agreeing to take the minutes. -TM ___________________________________________________ Thomas F. Mish Jr. - Informatics Systems Specialist SMPH-IT Biomedical Informatics Services School of Medicine and Public Health, UW-Madison [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> - (608)616-0362 ________________________________ UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today. The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
