5. don't know. If I had my druthers, I suppose I would pick 2: to Harvard via UTHSCSA.
p.s. this seems like a technical design issue, and I don't see anything confidential, so I'm copying gpc-dev. -- Dan ________________________________ From: Hale, Daniel E [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 10:21 AM To: Russ Waitman; Dan Connolly; Brittany Zschoche Subject: Urgent question related to data flow for the obesity and antibiotics project if the IRB application is to get done For the 5 participating GPC sites(node), is it anticipated that the data will flow (pick 1). I need to understand this to complete the IRB paperwork Option 1 Each GPC Node directly to Harvard Pilgrim Coordinating Site Option 2 Each GPC Node to Central Site in San Antonio then to Harvard Pilgrim Coordinating Site Option 3 Each GPC Node to Central Site in KU then to Harvard Pilgrim Coordinating Site Option 4 Each GPC Node to Central Site in San Antonio then to the GPC Coordinating site at KUMC then to Harvard Pilgrim Coordinating Site Option 5 I do not have a clue Thanks, Dan
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
