Dan and others:  It seems useful to know which “date” each site uses.
And the resulting paper(s) will read cleaner if we can obtain the same date 
from all or most of the GPC sites.
Other than that, I doubt it will matter much which date we used.
I can see advantages to the order date, and different advantages to the results 
date.
But the differences are not large enough to justify keeping multiple dates.
This is why I suggested using “order date”
But if only some sites have order date, and all have “specimen date” or all 
have “results date”, we’ll be better off using a date that is common across 
sites.
So we should find out – and Alona is trying to determine this – which sites use 
which dates.

Bernie

*************************************************************
Bernard S. Black
Chabraja Professor, Northwestern University
Pritzker Law School and Kellogg School of Management
375 East Chicago Ave., Chicago IL 60611
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
tel:  law:  312-503-2784<tel:312-503-2784>; Kellogg 
847-491-5049<tel:847-491-5049>; cell: 847-807-9599<tel:847-807-9599>
papers on SSRN at:  http://ssrn.com/author=16042
************************************************************

From: Dan Connolly [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 8:15 AM
To: Al'ona Furmanchuk <[email protected]>
Cc: Bernard Black <[email protected]>; 
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>; Phillip Reeder 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #551: next-D labs for cohort selection: fasting 
glucose, HbA1c

Why is the difference important? How does it affect the initial next-d cohort 
calculations?

On Jan 24, 2017 6:06 PM, Al'ona Furmanchuk 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dan: It is important to be clear what each site use under "start_date". 
Especially for cases when ORDER_DATE is different from SPECIMEN_TAKEN_DATE.
I appreciate, Dan if you could gather this info.
It is important to be on the same terms when collecting data to the table 1.
Phillip: I agree that having order, specimen and result dates is good practice. 
This is what we have here at NU as well.

Alona.


On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Phillip Reeder 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
I’d recommend using the SPECIMEN_TAKEN_DATE/TIME for the start_date of a lab.  
I believe it is the more clinically correct time as the results of labs can 
sometimes take days to return.  We use the specimen time, followed by the 
result time, I believe.

For the PCORI CDM,  I plan on putting all of the needed date/times, (specimen, 
order, and result) into a small XML block in the observation_blob column so 
that I can have all the times when I ETL the data to the CDM schema.

Phillip

From: Gpc-dev 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
on behalf of Dan Connolly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 5:09 PM
To: Al'ona Furmanchuk 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Bernard Black <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #551: next-D labs for cohort selection: fasting 
glucose, HbA1c

Reviewing the HERON ETL code, I see it does populate the i2b2 start_date for 
labs from Epic's result_time, which looks more like RESULT_DATE.

I see that our code to build the PCORNet LAB_RESULT_CM.LAB_ORDER_DATE 
(PCORNetLoader_ora.sql#L1407<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_kumc-2Dbmi_i2p-2Dtransform_blob_cycle-5F2_Oracle_PCORNetLoader-5Fora.sql-23L1407&d=CwMGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=r-3hWL7GRVhUhyXY6FfVUluKJR3bYbrGXcwJilMRsew&s=15mzJs5mBXRjJaVBF517lyXrKZpf8T34ormHaKg3LFc&e=>)
 uses this start_date that came from result_time, so we're fudging things a bit 
there.

The HERON ETL code is used at KUMC and was the basis of work at UTHSCSA and 
UNMC. If the difference between LAB_ORDER_DATE and RESULT_DATE is significant 
for Next-D, I can find out how the other participating GPC sites do start_date 
for labs.

ref:

  *   
heron_load/epic_labs_transform.sql<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__informatics.kumc.edu_work_browser_heron-5Fload_epic-5Flabs-5Ftransform.sql&d=CwMGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=r-3hWL7GRVhUhyXY6FfVUluKJR3bYbrGXcwJilMRsew&s=hPyeoTk1rxBs-KcUqIi63F2281dWVsMxm6MfqeIfCBQ&e=>

--
Dan
________________________________
From: Al'ona Furmanchuk 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 4:35 PM
To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Mei Liu; Dan Connolly; Taylor, Bradley; Bernard Black
Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #551: next-D labs for cohort selection: fasting 
glucose, HbA1c
Dan,
great job!
Meanwhile, could you please clarify actual meaning of "start_date" in i2b2? Is 
it more like "LAB_OERDER_DATE" (when lab was ordered), "SPECIMEN_DATE" (when 
specimen was taken), "RESULT_DATE" (when results became available)?


Alona.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:06 PM, GPC Informatics 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
#551: next-D labs for cohort selection: fasting glucose, HbA1c
--------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  afurmanchuk   |       Owner:  meiliu
     Type:  design-issue  |      Status:  accepted
 Priority:  major         |   Milestone:  next-d
Component:  data-stds     |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:  545           |
--------------------------+-----------------------

Comment (by dconnolly):

 Alona, Mei,

 I managed to prototype using i2b2 and LOINC codes:

  - 8f27bee get FG_Intial, RG_Initial from i2b2 star schema
    
\\[https://github.com/dckc/nextd-study-<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_dckc_nextd-2Dstudy-2D&d=CwMGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=r-3hWL7GRVhUhyXY6FfVUluKJR3bYbrGXcwJilMRsew&s=8cIZsVCmoyoDjBW1tGTb_prwDMN_IGgft8UXuxzU_ow&e=>
 support/blob/master/NextDvariableExtractionOracleTable1GPC.sql#L138-L221
 NextDvariableExtractionOracleTable1GPC.sql lines  138-221]

 At KUMC, this results in ~500K rows in RG_Intial but 0 in FG_Intial:
 as I noted in comment:1, the LOINC code KU Hospital maps to (`Glucose
 SerPl-mCnc (2345-7)`) doesn't
 distinguish fasting from eating.

 Some changes were perhaps substantive, so I need you to evaluate the
 impact:
     - LAB_ORDER_DATE became start_date,
       which is more likely result date than order date
     - i2b2 start_date includes time

 Brad, I think this approach should work at other GPC sites. I'd appreciate
 if you'd (have George) take a look.

--
Ticket URL: 
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/551#comment:8<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__informatics.gpcnetwork.org_trac_Project_ticket_551-23comment-3A8&d=CwMGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=r-3hWL7GRVhUhyXY6FfVUluKJR3bYbrGXcwJilMRsew&s=q5XRCs9mpObkPc7ulpQzfsw9Jn3rFVbETfMjt3trCXs&e=>>
gpc-informatics 
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__informatics.gpcnetwork.org_&d=CwMGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=r-3hWL7GRVhUhyXY6FfVUluKJR3bYbrGXcwJilMRsew&s=ogeoxsPD0aMC7FuqpUSmDhs8rZZLMqOIUDFV8EHTGVw&e=>>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics



--
Al’ona Furmanchuk, Ph.D.
Research Associate

Center for Health Information Partnerships,
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
633 N. Saint Clair Street, 20th floor,
Chicago, IL 60611
Web: 
http://furmanchuk.com/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__furmanchuk.com_&d=CwMGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=r-3hWL7GRVhUhyXY6FfVUluKJR3bYbrGXcwJilMRsew&s=GJaQ7Yh0_yh-o6TOQemgACkph54eT5Alffcxd-ZHmpU&e=>
E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Phone: 312-503-34281

________________________________

UT Southwestern


Medical Center



The future of medicine, today.




--
Al’ona Furmanchuk, Ph.D.
Research Associate

Center for Health Information Partnerships,
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
633 N. Saint Clair Street, 20th floor,
Chicago, IL 60611
Web: 
http://furmanchuk.com/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__furmanchuk.com_&d=CwMGaQ&c=yHlS04HhBraes5BQ9ueu5zKhE7rtNXt_d012z2PA6ws&r=CqPxCu-EywA2wo4iO-6BFqfwPQ2roHdsnjQi7SSLgLE&m=r-3hWL7GRVhUhyXY6FfVUluKJR3bYbrGXcwJilMRsew&s=GJaQ7Yh0_yh-o6TOQemgACkph54eT5Alffcxd-ZHmpU&e=>
E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Phone: 312-503-34281

_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to