I believe other sites are finding this also. It is okay if you don't find LOINC codes in the LABS table. That tells us something and it's probably due to only a few labs being prioritized for the CDM initially.
-----Original Message----- From: GPC Informatics [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 5:17 PM To: [email protected]; Sravani Chandaka <[email protected]>; McDowell, Bradley D <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Campbell, James R <[email protected]>; McClay, James C <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Smith, Nicholas C <[email protected]>; Chrischilles, Elizabeth A <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #596: targeted cancer therapy study - Query 1, 2, 3 #596: targeted cancer therapy study - Query 1, 2, 3 --------------------------+---------------------------- Reporter: dconnolly | Owner: schandaka Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: gpc-phase2-h4 Component: data-sharing | Resolution: Keywords: all-sites | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------+---------------------------- Comment (by lv): I submitted results from Marshfield based on what Nick sent on Tuesday; however, within our data, we only found a few labs coded to LOINC: 48676-1. These tests were all dated 1998, and we dropped for the CDM based on the 1/1/2010 constraint. Is it problem to have no lab data for this? Are there other LOINC codes we could add? -- Ticket URL: <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/596#comment:32> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> Greater Plains Network - Informatics _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
