Grant reviewers: Somewhere in the range of 2-4 sentences describing the basis for the numerical score is adequate.
Hope that helps. Thanks. Steve -----Original Message----- From: GPC Informatics [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 12:19 PM To: Steve Fennel; Dan Connolly Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Michael Prittie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #621: review GPC Pilot applications #621: review GPC Pilot applications --------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: sfennel | Owner: sfennel Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: grouse-resdac-2 Component: data-sharing | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------+------------------------------ Comment (by dconnolly): Steve, Jim Campbell and Tom Mish would like to know how much narrative is expected in the reviews. They find providing the numeric scores straightforward. -- Ticket URL: <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/621#comment:2> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> Greater Plains Network - Informatics _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
