On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:19, David Guest wrote: > > Correct me, please, if I have once again misreported the details, but > > I know for certain that I lost interest when you explained the costs > > of this additional TC licensing. > > Yes you always have to pay the Microsoft tax. It's a saving in hardware > and techie time not licensing fees.
I guess that the advantage of the thin client is the reusing of old hardware, but is the disadvantage the same thing? (carrying over potentially crumbly hardware)? Does this diminish teh savings, considering hardware is relatively cheap these days? jh -- MIKE: [goes over to Helen, who examining herself in her compact] Here we are, baby. Ready for action, ready for fun, ready for love, and [checks his watch] it's only just gone one. HELEN: Is that the time? MIKE: No, time is an abstract concept. This is a wristwatch. HELEN: I must be going. [starts to leave] MIKE: Wait a minute! What's two foot long with a big round end? HELEN: [pause, smiles coyly] I don't know. MIKE: Neither do I, but I keep finding it in my cornflakes. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
