Tony Eviston wrote: >I realise that determining the standard format is a delicate bit of >compromise but I would like to restate that choosing rtf displays a very >pessimistic view that free text searching of all tables of an EHR will >never come to fruition (or perhaps alternatly that hardware will advance >to the point that on-the-fly searching through all the markup garbage >inherent in rtf will be possible). >Plain text is definitely the way to go - either as the sole message or a >s compulsory metadata attached to the message. >When database wide text searching does become reality, having gigabytes >of rtf encoded specialists reports, path results etc will be a real PITA. > > OK Tony. Pitifil can be easily configured to save as ASCII or UTF.
David -- "UFW. Deb does linux."
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
