If NEHTA mandated a small development team to provide tools to
translate each independent export XML schema into a standard format,
then all the companies would find themselves in an embarassing
situation if they objected to it, and also if they did not provide
tools to import from it.
They may have a point to make in the courts about their IP, but
politically and socially they would probably not choose to do so.
( Is there anybody from NEHTA on this list?)
Hugh.
David Guest wrote:
Dr Hugh Nelson wrote:
If there are functional web accessible records systems - like
v-practice - which I must confess I have not got into serious looking
at. ( currently working ok, i understand)
If there are processes that could transfer an patients information
from a MD xml export, or a BestPractice xml export or whatever records
system - into the web accessible records system.
Hugh
XML export is good. XML import is better. This presumes there is some
sort of agreed schema. In fact, they are all different. None of EHR
developers publish them and if you use something approximating HCN's
they'll take you to court.
I feel depressed.
David
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
|
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
