In 1993, many people objected to using PIT format as an interim
measure. "Wait for agreed standards" they said.
Still waiting.
Ian Haywood wrote:
Richard Hosking wrote:
I think this should be an additional item to the GPMP - it does seem to
be the way to get things done however.
Probably more important is the need to establish potential use of the data
Stipulate an open standard with certain components including medication
list
We quickly start running into all the old walls. We have no reliable way to identify individuals.
we can't agree on coding systems for diseases, and don't have any real candidates for coding medications, NETHA are
still thinking about forming a committee to discuss a work plan for key deliverables.....
Ian H
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
|
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
