Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:43, Greg Twyford wrote:
My other concern is the implications of MS SQL for the current crop of
'data extraction' tools being proposed as part of the answer to
Divisions' need to get practice level outcomes data to retain their
funding. This will apply to both MD3 and Practix.
I filled in a survey on the proposed Qs for collecting the practice level
outcomes data.
As our pathology comes as 'pit', it isn't searchable, so there goes one thing.
Our practice doesn't collect ATSIC data (I said for religious reasons) so we
will never be able to say how much we do for that group.
I can't see even a practice like ours being able to supply the requested data.
Liz
Liz,
In Sydney most of the providers will give GPs HL7 format results on
request. We are promoting it to our members.
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
