Quoting Greg Twyford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:43, Greg Twyford wrote: > > > >>My other concern is the implications of MS SQL for the current crop of > >>'data extraction' tools being proposed as part of the answer to > >>Divisions' need to get practice level outcomes data to retain their > >>funding. This will apply to both MD3 and Practix. > > > > > > I filled in a survey on the proposed Qs for collecting the practice level > > > outcomes data. > > As our pathology comes as 'pit', it isn't searchable, so there goes one > thing. > > Our practice doesn't collect ATSIC data (I said for religious reasons) so > we > > will never be able to say how much we do for that group. > > I can't see even a practice like ours being able to supply the requested > data. > > Liz > > Liz, > > In Sydney most of the providers will give GPs HL7 format results on > request. We are promoting it to our members. > > Greg >
We had hl7 once from the govmint lab, they gave up on it a few years ago. the private lab has just changed hands, so we may get hl7 from them in future. their results-on-web site is actually searchable, but I have to do it doc by doc rather than all six together. Liz _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
