Horst Herb wrote: >On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:30, Dr Hugh Nelson wrote: > > >>Why should its longevity be any different than any other product? >> >> > >If anything, I would take personal commitment of the chief programmer as >better and more trustworthy indicator for longevity too. > >In the past many GPs have experienced personally how even the largest >companies are no protection - at all I may say (look at MIMS script or the >indemnity insurance disaster for example) > >Ultimately trustworthy is however whoever puts the source code at least in >escrow, to be released automatically whenever the product is discontinued for >whatever reason. > > but nobody does.
David _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
