David More <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW - where is the implementation you mention in point 3?. > > "all core technologies have a working open-source implementation *at > release*"
The simple answer is that openEHR cannot be considered a core technology until a complte open source tool chain is available, including a working and complete openEHR engine/kernel. My recent posts have aimed at pointing out that the archetype definitions also have to be open sourced, not just teh software that interprets them. AFAIK, the openEHR don't have any problems with these ideas, but nor are they claiming that openEHR it is already a core technology - just that it is a candidate for such a role. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
