Barry Lollo wrote: > Peter, > > "It can, the driver has been in there for years, but no-one does it, > considering you have already paid for an SQLBase license and that's a > far better platform." > > That is certainly a debatable point about a "Far better Platform", mate. > I know a lot of people have a grudge against Microsoft, but I would > question the validity of that statement, or at least the criteria on > which that statement is based.!! I know I've probably pushed some > buttons I shouldn't have Pete, But...let's just agree to disagree on > that topic.. Everyone knows I'm a Microsoft Boy...and proud of it !! > So don't bother responding mate, we don't want to start World War III. > Let's just have a little chuckle to ourselves, and leave it there !! > > Regards > Barry Lollo > > Microsoft Rules !!
Sorry Barry, just can't leave it alone. I won't go into technical differences as Horst has already addressed this. Let's just say that I prefer an engine that can do the same work with 10s of megabytes of RAM *faster* than MSSQL can do using gigabytes of RAM. Peter. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
