Interesting
At least it is a bit more concise and punchy than the wishy washy stuff
that usually comes out of govt bodies.
I am not entirely clear what is meant by "web services" vs the current
setup - does this mean HTTP based comunication - ie real time, 5
transaction authentication of packets vs asynchronous UDP as in current
E mail?
What are the implications for state govts that have already signed up to
contracts with providers such as Healthlink? Will some bureaucrats be
resisting so they are not seen to have sold their mastrers an expensive
white elephant?
R
David More wrote:
Hi All,
Two position statements on secure messaging have appeared on the NEHTA
site (www.nehta.gov.au) under the publications section. Worth a look.
Apologies to all those who had spotted them.
Cheers
David
----
Dr David G More MB, PhD, FACHI
Phone +61-2-9438-2851 Fax +61-2-9906-7038
Skype Username : davidgmore
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
