David de Bhál wrote:

>We are purely services and apart from the criticism of our current
>attachment to IE 5.5 or greater have nothing in common with Monet except
>that we use the internet.
>  
>
Sorry David I thought the two of you were both ASPs.

<speculation>The way I read the documentation it seemed to me the $10
million to build an ASP medical record would suit large medical
organisations where the security issues would all be taken care of
in-house by default policies. The documentation talks about preferring
to roll out to rural and remote organisations and Aboriginal Medical
Services would seem to be the most likely target for this sort of grant
where the population is somewhat itinerant between their various health
care facilities.

The obvious group to benefit from something like this would be Primary.
You could walk into any Primary store and the docs would have full
access to your medical record. It would even give Bateman an opportunity
to enter the specialist market since there would be advantages in
vertical integration. I don't see it happening as it would entail them
writing off their $100 million investment in HCN.

If somebody else could make this work, it would be the death knell of
city solo and small group practice, but I guess that rang a while ago.
</speculation>

David

-- 
SIP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NodePhone +61 7 31290168
Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to