I am the first to admit my lack of technical knowledge and expertise and
this is why I defer to many on this list and others during discussions
involving the implementation of specs and standards in Health IMIT.  This
would also extend to the huge task of overall health care reform.

I have had several years of involvement in the RACGP and Divisions
delivering services in the area of IMIT.  I did not have the luxury during
that time to sit in an ivory tower or a silo somewhere to contemplate the
'big picture' as I had a fine balancing act to deliver day-to-day services
that fell within the scope of a contract with the federal government while
trying to deliver what GPs actually wanted in terms of Information
Management and Technology in their practices.

>From Day 1 for me, that service included education, training and heightened
awareness of security issues involved when using computers and the Internet
in the surgery.  One of the issues I always included was explanation of file
formats and their advantages and disadvantages.  MS Word documents always
fell into the less advantageous basket due to security (macro viruses) and
interoperability issues - at that time, there were still an abundance of
Word Perfect users and also some Mac users so my recommendation was to save
as rtf when needing to exchange with others for editing and creating as pdf
when wanting to post on the Internet.

Although I am not directly and specifically in the health arena today, I am
involved in community programs of education and training in IMIT and
continue to discourage use of MS Word doc format as a way to distribute
files.  Another reason to convert a .doc to a .pdf is that for most files
(those without copious amount of graphics or tables), this can significantly
compress the file size, making download over a pathetically slow rural
dialup connection a bit easier.  I know this probably doesn't matter for the
couple of files currently posted on the website in question but it is so
much easier, not to mention free, to make pdf files today than it was a few
years ago, I am just trying to figure out why people aren't getting the
message!

To most on this list, I would be considered to be preaching to the converted
and I realise this is a trifling issue in comparison to the nutting out of
web services and what messaging 'standards' will win out in the end and also
the bigger picture of Health Care Reform but it disheartens me that these
'little' details still get ignored and, yes, I will pedantically continue to
energetically thump an expired equine over the small issues because that is
the level at which I am operating - dealing with the 98% of users *not*
represented on this list.

BTW - didn't we have this same discussion last July on the old GPCG_TALK
list?

Regards,

Jan


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David More
Sent: Sunday, 26 February 2006 10:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Efficient health care; role of PHI


Jan,

I think you are a trifle form over substance.

Cheers

David

----
Dr David G More MB, PhD, FACHI
Phone +61-2-9438-2851 Fax +61-2-9906-7038
Skype Username : davidgmore
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:24:42 +1100, J Collett wrote:
>> Take a look at:
>>
>> http://www.healthreform.org.au/index.asp
>>
> I'll read them when they start posting their articles and editorials in a
more appropriate format
> such as the conventional .pdf.
>
>> http://www.hospitalreformgroup.org/
>>
> Awaiting them to post their 'papers' to substantiate their 'Manifesto' -
and hopefully, these
> also will take accepted file format of pdf.
>
> Jan
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.9/261 - Release Date: 15/02/2006
> _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1418 (20060224) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.0/269 - Release Date: 24/02/2006
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to