On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:29, Tim Churches wrote:
> Yes, there is clearly a lot more work needed on the coding routines, but
> remember that this was something put together by undergraduate students
> in just a week or so, and given that, I think it shows a lot of promise.
> I suspect that what Jon and his students learn from the text submitted
> will be invaluable for scoping out the extent and difficulty of further
> development. I think this is an exciting project, and I'd much rather
> see time (and perhaps some modest funding) being invested in things like
> this than for us to collectively put our brains in neutral and instead
> just get out the cheque book (Standards Australia will no doubt insist
> that should be check book) and buy (very expensive) software from
> companies such as http://www.healthlanguage.com
that's why, although a late starter I have started putting in entries and
subsequent comments
--
I expect that noone has objections. However, if I'd only add these entries
to the list because `I think it's the right thing to do', I'd get a lot of
flames afterwards :)
-- Christian Schwarz
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
