Greg Twyford wrote: > One of my inhibitions about terminal services is that you become > absolutely dependent on the terminal server. The major choices become a > high-end 'real' server with redundant everything, like a fully kitted HP > ML350-G4, or a second terminal server online with double the licensing, > hardware and other costs,
We use the "bunch of similar boxes" approach. 2 workstations are identical to the server hardware-wise (although less RAM). Two years ago I had to move the server's sata RAID array (2 drives) onto one of these spares when the server's graphics card failed (I initially thought it was the MB) - this process took about 15 minutes. Our experience using terminal server 2000 on low to mid range hardware has been a very happy one. Tony _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
