On Wednesday 26 April 2006 16:50, Mario Ruiz wrote: > with a robust ehr architecture and a clear legal framework in place > nothing precludes the patient from being the holder of the ehr without
we keep dreaming about a robust EHR architecture. A clear legal framework in place however is something we only dare to dream about in our dreams. > The patient hasn't probably got a chance in a 100 > million of altering the ehr even if it tried. I don't know of a single current commercial EHR system that is not trivial to tamper with A patient who is confused by using a keyboard and mouse, perhaps. But any patient with some basic programming skills (I daresay thwere are more of them than 1 in 100 million) can tamper to their hearts content with almost no obstacles at all - if they would have the only copy of the EHR Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
