On Thursday 27 April 2006 00:30, Andrew Patterson wrote: > Which is not to say there is anything wrong with your > proposed system - its just that it only works because the > main bit of it doesn't involve polling (as per Ross' point)
From the *end users* perspective all the *end user* does is polling There is no point in inventing artificial scenarios and impractical technicalities. My point is that message *delivery* by email works. It is time proven, robust, scalable, available, and not a single good reason to needlessly replace it. It is a universally useful transport vehicle for whatever message format in unstable and unreliable networks Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
