At 7:30 pm +1000 11/5/06, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:22, Andrew Patterson wrote:
I see the usefulness of getting it to the 3 minute mark. You
see the usefulness. I'm worried that HL7 as an organisation
doesn't see the usefulness. Because frankly, trying to do
decentralised messaging we have been discussing is doomed
to failure if the standards don't get to that point.
We are not achieving anything with the HL7 business in real life.
The emperor has no clothes.
We get all our pathology from three labs (2 big, one smaller) as HL7.
We have atomic pathology data in our database, which can be extracted
for the purposes of the National Primary Care Collaboratives.
Ian.
--
Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for urgent matters, please send a copy to my practice email as well:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
PRIVACY NOTE
I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email lists.
Please ask my permission first if you wish to forward private email
to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
