On 13/05/2006, at 7:23 AM, Ian Cheong wrote:

Sorry not really. From the article above:

I think it's actually critically important that the reasons for supporting standards in our products - particularly IE - be business ones. As in other thread (IHE/XDS) talking about telecoms standards, businesses will only comply with voluntary standards if it makes them money. The minute they think they can assist their own business by not supporting standards, they will fudge them. eg SQL non-standards in the marketplace.

The reason M$ has changed is only because it has hurt them in the market - losing share to Firefox.

Whatever the reasons, it's a step in the right direction, and means that for the first time there is light at the end of the tunnel for web developers, who should be able in the not to distant future to only need to code a web site once.

Browser "lack of standards" still makes some web sites fall over on anything but M$ browsers. Government should regulate in the interests of consumers.

Well developers that only test on IE should no longer exist. Even the biggest companies - banks, MS themselves are now writing code that works in IE and better browsers.

This is a win for the people - MS gave up on development of IE 5 years ago, and there has not been a single functional update since. They assumed that they had achieved their original goal (the destruction of Netscape as a company) and that standards would have to bend to their ways of doing things. Open sourcing Netscape the browser was the stroke of genius they couldn't predict (because they just don't get it (yet)) and ironically it's this browser that has now become the IE killer.

What I don't understand is their rekindled obsession with the browser market. MS wouldn't lose a single sale if they removed IE from Windows. They have never made a cent from IE in isolation but it has cost them billions. If they were very clever they would either open source IE or just remove it and bundle Firefox or another more standards compliant browser with Windows.

Peter.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to